IS2000 | Principles of Information Science
  • Home
  • Schedule
  • Policies
  • Labs
    • Lab - SQL, SQLite
    • Lab - R
    • Lab - Decision Analysis
  • Resources
    • Lecture Notes >
      • Information Science as a Discipline
      • Information Modeling, Ontologies, UML
      • Information Architecture
      • Information Theory
      • Essential Excel
      • Essential R
      • Information Representation in XML
      • Patterns XML & DTD
      • Information Retrieval with XPath
      • Information Transformation with XSL
      • Information Storage in RDB
      • Information Retrieval with SQL
      • Information Retrieval Specification Algebras
      • Information Processing in R
      • Information-Based Decision
      • Information Management & Policy
      • Information Security & Privacy
      • Information Transmission
      • Information Systems
      • Predictive Analytics
      • Process Analytics
      • Information Visualization
    • Text Books
    • Tools
    • Additional Readings
    • Archive
  • Help
    • Blog

Decision Theory

5/8/2016

0 Comments

 
In today's class we talked about data, information, and knowledge. Data is sometimes a numeric and sometimes qualitative, like this blog post. Once we add context we get information. Information has an associated certainty. Once we have a level of certainty that we are comfortable with we have knowledge. We use that knowledge to drive our actions, i.e., make decisions.

I read this blog today by Jared Dillian and I wanted to share it with you as it explains decision behavior and how even with knowledge and knowing the probabilities of the information, different people make different decisions and sometimes those decisions are "emotional" rather than "rational" -- and we often presume, as Information Scientists, that decisions are made rationally and without emotion (or a degree of "irrationality".)

Here's an excerpt from his blog:

If you’ve ever taken a decision theory class (I have, and it was awesome), this is the first thing you learn.
You have a 50/50 chance of winning $10,000. You have P = 0.5 of getting $10,000 and P = 0.5 of getting 0.
Or you can choose not to play the game and get $3,000. What do you do? The answer is: it depends on who you are and what your risk preferences are. Rationally, the number to get you to walk away should be $5,000. But most people will walk away for less. Sometimes much less. Sometimes people will walk away for $500 or $1,000. After all, it’s money they didn’t have before. Anyone who accepts less than $5,000 to walk away is known as risk-averse. Here is where things get interesting. Turn the experiment on its head. Tell people they have a 50/50 chance of either losing $10,000 or breaking even. Then tell them that they could either take their chances with the 50/50 game or they could lose a certain $2,000. Faced with this choice, people will roll the dice. Every. Single. Time. Nobody wants to “lock in” a certain loss. As long as there is a chance that they could break even, they will hope—except hope is not a strategy. This is known as loss aversion.
0 Comments

Submitting clickable URLs in Blackboard

10/3/2011

0 Comments

 
Your links to blog entries and other online content should be clickable so that your instructor does not have to copy and paste URL strings. Here's a video on how to do that.
0 Comments

    Author

    Write something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview.

    Archives

    May 2016
    October 2011

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Picture

Learning

Blackboard
Lynda.com

Support

Contact Instructor
FAQ
Terms of Use
© COPYRIGHT 2016-20 by Martin Schedlbauer
​FREE FOR ACADEMIC USE WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. 
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.